<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Network on Your License</title><link>https://yourlicense.ca.dev.prosyon.ca/tags/network/</link><description>Recent content in Network on Your License</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-ca</language><atom:link href="https://yourlicense.ca.dev.prosyon.ca/tags/network/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Server Side Public License v1.0</title><link>https://yourlicense.ca.dev.prosyon.ca/licenses/sspl-1.0/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://yourlicense.ca.dev.prosyon.ca/licenses/sspl-1.0/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;SSPL is MongoDB&amp;rsquo;s response to the AGPL &amp;ldquo;loophole&amp;rdquo;: if you offer the software as a managed service, you must also release under SSPL the source code of every program you use to offer that service — provisioning, monitoring, orchestration, backup. In effect, it is strong copyleft extended to your service stack.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The OSI rejected SSPL as not meeting the Open Source Definition, specifically on Criterion 6 (no discrimination against fields of endeavour). It is therefore fair-code / source-available, not open source.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>